How PLG Outperforms Traditional Sales Strategies in B2B?

Product-Led Growth is transforming B2B growth strategies, reducing acquisition costs, and empowering users to drive organic expansion.

What the heck is Product-Led Growth (PLG)?

When we talk about Product-Led Growth (PLG), we're essentially shifting the focus of a company's growth engine to the product itself. Instead of relying heavily on sales teams and marketing campaigns to drive growth, PLG leverages the product as the primary driver for acquiring, retaining, and expanding users. In simple terms, your product becomes the best salesperson you have.

But let’s break that down a bit more.

Definition of PLG

Product-Led Growth is a strategy where the product is at the center of customer acquisition, retention, and expansion. Your product is designed not only to deliver value but to showcase that value right from the start—whether through freemium models, free trials, or simply a seamless user experience that turns your users into your advocates.

In PLG, the product does the talking. People use it, love it, share it, and—more importantly—they decide to buy based on their experience with the product itself. No heavy-handed sales tactics required.

Companies like Slack, Zoom, and Dropbox have mastered this, offering users a taste of their value upfront, which in turn leads to organic growth.

Importance in the Growth Strategy

Why is PLG so important? The beauty of a PLG approach lies in its scalability and cost-efficiency. When the product is the growth engine, customer acquisition costs (CAC) drop, and customer lifetime value (LTV) increases. This is because your users discover the value of your product on their own terms, making them more likely to stick around for the long haul.

For example, let’s look at Zoom. During its explosive growth, Zoom's freemium model lets users experience the product without any upfront investment. People loved the experience and started spreading the word.

Zoom didn’t have to rely on an army of salespeople; the product spoke for itself. That’s the core power of PLG—

It leverages the viral potential of user satisfaction to drive growth.

Why not just focus on sales-led growth? After all, it’s worked for decades, especially in B2B.

Comparison Between PLG and Sales-Led Strategies

A Sales-Led Growth strategy is more traditional and heavily reliant on human touchpoints. It’s driven by personal relationships, extensive demos, and, in many cases, large contracts that need sales reps to guide the buyer through the decision-making process.

For industries where products are complex or require a lot of customization, this model can still be highly effective.

But here’s where PLG shines: the user is in control from the very beginning. Instead of waiting for a sales rep to reach out, set up a demo, and push them down a funnel, the user can start experiencing the product immediately.

This is a huge advantage, particularly in today’s world where users want immediate solutions, not prolonged negotiations. By the time a sales rep enters the picture, if ever, the user is already familiar with the product and understands its value.

A real-life example of this would be Slack vs. Microsoft Teams.

Microsoft Teams originally employed a more traditional sales-led model, relying on corporate sales deals to get users onboard.

Slack, on the other hand, embraced PLG from the start. Teams of developers and companies began using Slack organically, often without a top-down directive, simply because it was easier and faster to adopt. This allowed Slack to penetrate organizations from the ground up, while Teams required more top-level buy-in through sales efforts.

👹

Does this mean PLG is perfect? Not exactly. PLG doesn’t work as effectively in all industries—particularly those with high-touch, complex solutions that require customization. For example, Salesforce continues to thrive using a sales-led approach because their product often needs extensive customization and deep integration with other systems, making human-led interactions essential. (Ironically, Slack was acquired by Salesforce in 2021)

However, even in those industries, hybrid models are emerging, where companies combine PLG with sales-led strategies. In these cases, PLG helps drive initial engagement, while a sales team comes in later to seal large enterprise deals. Think of Atlassian, which famously used PLG for its initial growth but employs a sales team to manage its large enterprise clients.

---

B2B Growth Strategy Evolution

The landscape of B2B growth is undergoing a dramatic shift. For decades, B2B companies relied on traditional sales-driven strategies—heavily focused on building relationships with decision-makers, long sales cycles, and top-down enterprise contracts. But with the rise of Product-Led Growth and changes in customer expectations, we’ve seen a significant transition from sales-driven to user-driven growth in the B2B space.

Shifts in B2B from Sales-Driven to User-Driven Growth

In the traditional B2B approach, Sales reps built relationships with executives, tailored pitches to solve organizational pain points, and aimed to close large enterprise deals. The process was lengthy and often disconnected from the actual users of the product.

In short, the buyer wasn’t the user. This dynamic led to clunky, difficult-to-use products that were chosen more for their ability to solve business problems on paper than their usability in practice.

However, in recent years, things have started to change. User-driven growth has taken center stage in B2B, much like it did in B2C. Instead of relying solely on top-down sales efforts, companies are now empowering the end-user to drive product adoption. This bottom-up approach lets users experience the product firsthand, which ultimately creates demand within the organization.

For instance, Slack didn’t target CEOs or procurement officers first. It targeted teams of developers, marketers, and other employees who adopted the product because it made their work lives easier.

These users didn’t need approval from higher-ups to start using Slack. Over time, as more teams adopted it, Slack began to spread organically across entire organizations, forcing enterprise buyers to take notice. Instead of pushing the product downwards from executives, users were pulling it upwards through the company.

Product Consumerization and Its Impact on B2B Products

One of the key drivers of this user-driven growth is product consumerization—a trend where B2B products are becoming just as user-friendly, intuitive, and engaging as B2C products.

Think about tools like Zoom or Dropbox. These products initially targeted consumers, which meant they had to be easy to use, visually appealing, and responsive. Now, as they’ve entered the B2B space, they’ve carried that same consumer-centric approach with them. As a result, We get B2B software that feels more like consumer apps, making adoption smoother and faster.

This consumerization trend is forcing B2B companies to step up their game. Users now expect the same level of simplicity, design, and overall experience that they get from their favorite consumer apps. And if your product doesn’t meet that standard, users are quick to move on.

In many ways, this trend is a response to the increasing influence of millennial and Gen Z employees, who grew up with user-centric products and are now bringing those expectations into the workplace.

A great example is Figma. Originally designed for individual designers, it now powers collaboration for teams in companies of all sizes. Figma's success comes from the fact that it was built with the user experience in mind.

As teams adopted it organically, businesses followed, leading to widespread enterprise adoption. And the more intuitive and seamless the product, the easier it is for users to champion it within their companies.

👹

But let’s pause and ask a question: Isn’t the enterprise buyer still important in B2B? Absolutely. However, the relationship between the buyer and the user has fundamentally changed. Enterprise buyers still hold the purse strings, but they are increasingly influenced by what their teams are using and loving. That’s why product consumerization is so powerful—it aligns user satisfaction with business objectives, driving a new kind of growth.

The takeaway here is that B2B growth is becoming more flexible, user-centric, and responsive to the evolving needs of the market. Whether you’re a startup or an established enterprise, recognizing the shifts in B2B growth strategies—and adopting a user-driven, product-centric approach—will be critical to staying ahead of the competition.

---

Freemium vs. Trial Models

One of the most debated topics in product growth strategy is the choice between freemium and trial models. Both approaches allow users to experience your product without an upfront payment, but they do so in fundamentally different ways. Choosing between the two depends on your product, your users, and your growth objectives. Let’s dive into the differences.

Definition and Application of Freemium and Trial Models

At a high level, freemium and trial models are both ways to give users a taste of your product before they commit to buying. But they approach this goal in different ways:

• Freemium is a model where users get free, ongoing access to a basic version of your product. The free version typically has limited features, usage caps, or lower performance thresholds. Users can upgrade to a premium (paid) version to unlock additional features or increase usage limits. For example, Spotify offers a free version with ads, while users can upgrade to the premium version for an ad-free experience and additional features like offline listening.

• Trial models, on the other hand, provide users with access to the full product for a limited time—say 7, 14, or 30 days. Once the trial period ends, the user must decide whether to purchase the product to continue using it. Trials are often used when companies want to showcase the full power of their product upfront, especially if they believe it will drive faster conversions. Adobe Creative Cloud is a good example of this, offering a free trial of its suite of tools before requiring a subscription.

Why Freemium Models Often Work Better, Especially in B2B

First, freemium models remove the pressure of a time-bound experience. In a trial, the user has to evaluate the product under the gun—sometimes during a busy period or before they’ve had time to fully explore its capabilities. This can lead to frustration if the user didn’t get enough time to properly assess the product’s value.

Freemium, by contrast, allows the user to take their time. They can get to know the product at their own pace, use it in real-world situations, and truly understand its value over time. The low-pressure environment encourages deeper engagement, which often translates to higher retention and eventual conversion to paid plans.

Let’s take Zoom as an example. Zoom offers a freemium model with unlimited 1-on-1 meetings but imposes a time limit on group meetings. This model allowed Zoom to scale rapidly, especially among small teams and individuals who could use the free version indefinitely.

As teams grew or their needs expanded, they naturally hit the limits of the free version, creating a seamless transition to the paid version. Users weren’t rushed to make a decision—they upgraded because they were already sold on the product.

Another reason freemium works well in B2B is that it encourages virality and network effects. When individual users can access your product for free, they can share it with others—whether within their organization or externally. As more people get on board, the value of the product increases (think collaboration tools like Miro or Trello). This creates a natural word-of-mouth effect that accelerates growth in ways that a time-limited trial simply can’t achieve.

Strategic Use of Freemium for Indirect Monetization and Customer Acquisition

Freemium isn’t just about giving away a free version of your product and hoping people eventually upgrade. It’s a strategic tool for driving both indirect monetization and customer acquisition.

Let’s start with indirect monetization. Not every user who starts on a freemium plan will convert to a paying customer, and that’s okay. A well-designed freemium model can still generate significant value from these users. For example, SurveyMonkey offers a robust freemium plan that allows users to create and send surveys for free. Many of these users never upgrade, but they still drive immense value by bringing in new users—whether through shared surveys, collaboration, or exposure to the product. SurveyMonkey effectively uses its freemium model to fuel virality, bringing in more users who eventually convert to paid plans.

There’s also a network effect at play here. As freemium users invite others to use the product, the product’s value grows exponentially within teams and organizations. Think about Dropbox: by offering free storage, Dropbox made it easy for users to share files and collaborate. As more people used the product, Dropbox became an essential tool for teams, leading to more upgrades to the paid version for additional storage and features.

Now, let’s talk about customer acquisition. Freemium is often seen as a “Trojan horse” that gets your product into the hands of users who might not otherwise have considered it. In B2B, this means individual users can start using your product without waiting for approval from procurement or upper management. Over time, as more users within an organization adopt the product, the company may decide to upgrade to a paid version to unlock more features, ensure compliance, or scale usage across departments.

A great example is Figma, a collaborative design tool. As teams grow or companies start to recognize Figma’s value across multiple departments, they upgrade to paid plans. The freemium model essentially acts as a low-friction entry point, removing barriers to adoption and allowing users to explore the product at their own pace.

In addition to indirect monetization and customer acquisition, freemium can also be used as a data-gathering tool. By monitoring how free users interact with the product, companies can identify trends, discover adjacent use cases, and inform product development. For instance, LinkedIn’s freemium model generates immense amounts of data that fuel its sales and recruiting products, which are built on top of the free user base.

👹

“But isn’t freemium just giving away value for free without any guarantee of conversion?” It can feel that way, especially if your free users aren’t converting as quickly as you’d like. However, the key to freemium success lies in understanding the value exchange. You’re not just giving something away—you’re gaining user engagement, brand visibility, virality, and potential leads. And while not every user will convert to paid, those who do are often more deeply engaged and have a higher lifetime value because they’ve already proven the product’s value to themselves over time.

In fact, the challenge for companies using freemium is to carefully balance the free and paid features. If the free version is too good, users may never feel the need to upgrade. If it’s too limited, they may not stick around long enough to see the value in upgrading. This is where testing and iteration come into play. A good freemium model evolves with user behavior and adapts to ensure that there’s always a compelling reason to make the leap to paid.

---

Challenges in Scaling Product-Led Growth

Product-Led Growth (PLG) sounds like the perfect growth engine, right? But as many companies discover, scaling PLG has its challenges—especially when sales teams get involved. PLG can be crushed when sales takes over, So Let’s see how to balance product-led and sales-led growth, and why it’s essential to retain your PLG DNA as you scale.

How PLG Can Be Crushed by Introducing Sales Teams

PLG and sales aren’t natural enemies, but they can come into conflict when not handled carefully. Many companies start off with a successful PLG strategy, experiencing organic growth through the product alone. Users love the product, share it with others, and help it spread like wildfire. But as the company grows and starts targeting larger enterprise customers, the temptation arises to layer in sales teams to capture bigger deals.

The problem? If sales teams dominate the conversation, PLG can quickly get sidelined. The product is no longer the primary driver of growth—sales takes over. This can lead to heavy customization, top-down selling, and even drifting away from user-centric innovation. You start building features to close enterprise deals rather than to improve the product for users. Over time, this can alienate the very users who loved your product in the first place.

Take Dropbox as an example. Dropbox began as a PLG darling—easy to use, free to try, and designed for individual users and small teams. But as they scaled and shifted focus to the enterprise, they brought in sales teams to land bigger deals. For a while, it worked, but some of that original product simplicity was lost in the process. It’s a classic case of losing focus on the product in favor of chasing larger contracts.

When the focus shifts too heavily toward enterprise sales, PLG risks getting buried under the weight of the sales organization. Users who once flocked to the product because of its simplicity and ease of use can feel left behind as the product evolves to meet the needs of large enterprises rather than individual users or small teams.

Balancing Product and Sales-Led Growth

Does this mean you should never introduce a sales team if you have a PLG model? Of course not. In fact, balancing PLG with sales-led growth is one of the most important and challenging tasks for scaling companies. The key is to layer sales on top of a strong PLG foundation, not replace PLG with sales.

It starts with understanding when and where sales can add value without disrupting the core PLG strategy. Typically, PLG works best for driving adoption at the lower levels of an organization—individual users, small teams, and departments. But when it comes to converting these smaller users into large enterprise-wide contracts, that’s where sales teams shine.

Think of it this way: let the product handle bottom-up adoption, while sales teams focus on top-down expansion. This hybrid approach allows you to leverage the power of PLG to drive user growth and engagement while still capturing those high-value enterprise deals through targeted sales efforts.

Atlassian has done this masterfully. They grew through PLG by offering free and low-cost tools like Jira and Trello, which became widely adopted by developers and teams. As those teams grew and Atlassian’s products spread throughout the company, the sales team could step in to negotiate enterprise-level deals without compromising the PLG strategy.

But it’s not just dividing responsibilities between the product and sales—it’s about alignment. For PLG to coexist with sales, the sales team needs to be aligned with the product’s value proposition. Sales should be an extension of the product experience, not an alternative to it.

That means working closely with product and growth teams to ensure that the features and pricing structure support both self-service users and enterprise customers. Sales should complement the PLG motion by targeting opportunities where the product is already gaining traction and expanding those accounts.

Importance of Retaining the Original PLG DNA During Company Expansion

One of the biggest risks when scaling PLG is losing sight of the original product DNA that made the company successful in the first place. As a company grows, it’s easy to start prioritizing the demands of enterprise customers over the needs of the broader user base. This is where things go wrong. You might start building highly specific features for enterprise clients that don't benefit the majority of users. Over time, the product can become bloated and difficult to use, drifting away from the simplicity and focus that originally drove adoption.

To prevent this, it’s crucial to protect your PLG DNA. That means continuing to innovate for your core user base, even as you scale up. Don’t fall into the trap of becoming purely enterprise-focused—continue to build features that benefit the broader user base and improve the core product for everyone. This keeps your product attractive to new users and helps ensure that you can continue driving organic growth even as you expand into larger markets.

Look at Slack again as a great example of maintaining PLG DNA during growth. Even after Slack began targeting larger enterprise clients and introducing sales teams, they kept iterating on their core product for individual users and small teams. Features like easy integrations, streamlined user experience, and accessible free plans kept the product appealing to new users, allowing Slack to retain its PLG momentum even as it expanded into the enterprise.

Another important factor in retaining your PLG DNA is culture. As your company scales, make sure that the focus on user experience and product-driven growth remains a core part of your culture. This can be as simple as regularly gathering user feedback, involving product teams in growth discussions, and making sure that everyone in the company understands that the product—not just sales—is still at the heart of the growth strategy.

👹

“But don’t larger contracts and enterprise deals keep the company financially stable?” Absolutely, and that’s why it’s tempting to prioritize enterprise features. But the danger lies in becoming too focused on these deals at the expense of your broader user base. When you sacrifice product usability and user experience to land big contracts, you risk losing the organic growth engine that got you to this point in the first place.

Enterprise deals shouldn’t come at the cost of your original product vision. Your PLG strategy needs to be carefully guarded even as you expand into the enterprise space.

---

Product-Led Sales (PLS)

As companies grow and scale, they often find themselves blending different growth strategies. Product-Led Sales (PLS) is a hybrid model that leverages the best of PLG while layering in sales efforts to expand enterprise relationships and close larger deals. Let’s see how it will reshape the sales-led market in the future, and why it leads to lower acquisition costs and product-enabled lead generation.

Emerging Trend of Layering Sales onto PLG

Product-Led Sales is exactly what it sounds like: layering sales onto a PLG foundation. In the early days, many PLG companies, like Slack and Zoom, grew by relying entirely on their product to attract and retain users. But as they expanded and started targeting larger enterprise customers, it became clear that relying on the product alone wasn’t enough to close big deals. That’s where sales teams come in.

Here’s how it works: the product does the heavy lifting in terms of attracting users, delivering value, and encouraging adoption. Users can sign up and start using the product on their own, without needing to go through a salesperson. But as the product gains traction within a company, a sales team can step in to close larger contracts or offer premium services that the company might need as it scales.

The key is that sales doesn’t drive initial adoption—the product does. Instead, sales teams capitalize on the momentum that the product has already generated.

The PLS is the natural evolution of PLG. As products mature and penetrate larger organizations, the need for human touchpoints becomes more important. Sales teams add value by formalizing the relationship, negotiating terms, and managing complex enterprise needs that the product alone might not address. But crucially, these sales efforts are built on top of the product’s success, not in place of it.

Take Atlassian as a prime example. Atlassian’s suite of products, like Jira and Confluence, were initially adopted by small teams and developers through a PLG approach. But as those tools spread within organizations, Atlassian brought in sales teams to manage larger contracts with enterprise clients. The sales teams didn’t drive the initial adoption—they came in after the product had proven its value.

This is the essence of PLS: letting the product open the door and then using sales to seal the deal.

How PLS Will Reshape the Sales-Led Market in the Future

Historically, sales-led companies have relied on top-down sales strategies, where the sales team is responsible for driving growth by closing large contracts with enterprise buyers. This approach required heavy sales and marketing investments, long sales cycles, and extensive relationship-building.

But in PLS, the sales-led model is being turned on its head. Instead of sales teams doing all the work, the product creates bottom-up momentum that leads to natural adoption within organizations. This means that by the time sales gets involved, users are already familiar with the product, and the conversation is less about proving the value of the product and more about formalizing the relationship and expanding usage.

This shift will continue to reshape the sales industry as more companies adopt hybrid growth models. We’re likely to see fewer traditional sales teams whose sole responsibility is cold calling, prospecting, and demoing products. Instead, sales teams will increasingly act as facilitators, stepping in once the product has already demonstrated value.

In the PLG era, sales becomes more consultative, focusing on customizing solutions, managing large-scale deployments, and building long-term relationships with enterprise clients.

In fact, HubSpot is another great example of this transition. Originally, HubSpot grew as a PLG company, offering freemium tools to attract users. As these users scaled their usage, HubSpot introduced sales teams to convert them into paying customers and help them navigate more complex needs like CRM integration and marketing automation. HubSpot’s PLS approach allowed it to expand into larger markets without abandoning the product-led growth engine that got it there in the first place.

So, how will PLS reshape the sales market moving forward?

We’ll likely see smaller, more specialized sales teams focused on managing large accounts and customizing enterprise solutions rather than driving initial adoption. Salespeople will spend less time on cold outreach and more time on expanding product usage within organizations that are already using the tool. This shift will make sales teams more efficient and less reliant on traditional methods of lead generation.

Lower Acquisition Costs and Product-Enabled Lead Generation

One of the biggest benefits of Product-Led Sales is its ability to lower acquisition costs. In traditional sales-led models, customer acquisition is expensive. Companies spend heavily on marketing, sales teams, and lead generation to get prospects into the funnel. But with PLS, much of the early-stage acquisition is handled by the product itself. The product attracts users, provides value, and drives engagement—all without the need for a sales team to get involved.

This means that by the time a sales team steps in, the cost of acquiring that customer is already much lower. Users are already familiar with the product, they’ve likely already used it in some capacity, and they’re further along in the decision-making process. This dramatically reduces the amount of time and resources the sales team needs to spend on nurturing leads and guiding them through the funnel.

Let’s look at Notion as a real-life example. Notion started as a PLG company, offering a free version that users could sign up for without talking to anyone. As individuals and teams adopted Notion and started using it for project management and collaboration, the product did the heavy lifting in terms of lead generation.

When these users outgrew the free version and needed more robust features, Notion’s sales teams could step in to offer customized solutions and enterprise packages. This lowers the overall cost per acquisition because the product has already done most of the work by the time sales gets involved.

The product-enabled lead generation that PLS fosters is incredibly powerful. Instead of relying on outbound marketing campaigns or expensive lead-generation efforts, companies can leverage product usage data to identify high-potential leads.

For example, companies can track which users or teams are engaging the most with their product, which features are being used most frequently, and which users are approaching usage limits. This data can then be handed off to the sales team, who can step in at the right time with a tailored offer.

In the PLS model, lead generation doesn’t come from cold outreach or paid ads—it comes from within the product itself. This makes the entire process more efficient, lowering customer acquisition costs and improving the effectiveness of the sales team.

👹

“But doesn’t layering in sales risk complicating a streamlined PLG model?” It’s a valid concern. Adding sales to a product-led approach can create friction if it’s done poorly—especially if the sales team takes over too much of the customer relationship and pushes users through a high-pressure sales funnel. That’s why it’s crucial that sales teams in a PLS model work in harmony with the product. Sales should amplify the product experience, not compete with it.

---

General Advice on Growth

When it comes to growth, the goal isn’t just rapid expansion—it’s sustainability and defensibility. Growth strategies should be more than just quick wins; they should be designed to last, evolve, and protect your competitive edge over time. Whether you’re scaling through Product-Led Growth (PLG), layering in sales with Product-Led Sales (PLS), or using a mix of growth models, the underlying principles remain the same.

Building a Sustainable and Defensible Growth Model

Growth is exciting, but without a solid foundation, it can lead to instability and burnout. Sustainability in growth means that your strategy can continue driving success over the long term, not just during the initial phases of expansion. A defensible growth model ensures that your strategy isn’t easily copied or disrupted by competitors. These two qualities are crucial to long-term success.

To build a sustainable and defensible growth model, start with a clear understanding of your core value proposition. What sets your product apart from the competition? Why do your users love it? These questions should guide every decision you make about growth. If your growth strategy isn’t built on your product’s unique strengths, it will be vulnerable to competitors who can replicate your tactics but offer something better.

Let’s take Spotify as an example. Spotify’s core value proposition was its massive music library, coupled with its intuitive playlist and recommendation features. They built a sustainable growth model by focusing on user experience and retention through features like Discover Weekly and curated playlists.

What made it defensible? The scale of their user data and the network effects that resulted from millions of people creating and sharing playlists, making it difficult for competitors to replicate the same depth of personalization.

A sustainable growth model is also scalable. As your user base grows, your systems, infrastructure, and processes must grow with it. This is where automation and data-driven decision-making become critical. You can’t rely on manual processes or one-off solutions to sustain long-term growth. Automating customer onboarding, using AI for personalized recommendations, and building strong data analytics capabilities are just a few ways to ensure your growth model scales as you grow.

Avoiding Common Pitfalls in Growth Strategy Execution

Growth isn’t a straight line—it’s a winding road filled with obstacles. Companies often fall into the trap of pursuing growth at all costs, which can lead to some major pitfalls.

One of the most common mistakes is over-indexing on short-term growth tactics. It’s easy to get caught up in the allure of quick wins—whether that’s through aggressive paid acquisition, heavy discounting, or viral marketing campaigns. But if these tactics aren’t backed by a long-term strategy, they can lead to burnout.

For example, if you’re relying heavily on paid ads to drive growth, what happens when you max out your ad spend or customer acquisition costs start to rise? A focus on short-term tactics often results in diminishing returns over time.

Another pitfall is failing to align your growth strategy with your product’s lifecycle. Growth strategies need to evolve as your product matures. Early on, the focus may be on acquisition, but as your user base grows, you need to shift toward retention and monetization. Too many companies stay stuck in “acquisition mode,” continuing to pour money into customer acquisition without properly investing in retention or upselling.

A great example of this pitfall is Groupon. In its early days, Groupon exploded through aggressive marketing and customer acquisition tactics, offering massive discounts and deals that attracted millions of users.

But it struggled to retain those customers because the deals weren’t designed to build long-term relationships or loyalty. As a result, its growth eventually stagnated, and its initial success proved unsustainable.

To avoid these pitfalls, focus on building a balanced growth strategy that includes acquisition, retention, and expansion. Growth shouldn’t just be about getting more users in the door—it should also be about keeping them engaged, turning them into loyal customers, and expanding their lifetime value through upsells, cross-sells, and referrals.

Focusing on Frameworks Instead of Isolated Tactics

When you’re developing a growth strategy, it’s tempting to think in terms of isolated tactics: “We’ll run this ad campaign, launch this feature, or implement this referral program, and we’ll see growth.” But this kind of one-off, tactical thinking can lead to inconsistency and a lack of long-term focus.

Instead, successful companies develop growth frameworks—holistic approaches that guide decision-making, align teams, and create consistent, repeatable processes. A growth framework provides a roadmap for your efforts, ensuring that every tactic you use aligns with your larger growth strategy.

Let’s look at HubSpot, which uses a flywheel framework to drive growth. The flywheel is a circular model that focuses on attracting, engaging, and delighting customers in a continuous loop.

Every part of the customer journey is interconnected—acquisition leads to engagement, which leads to retention, which leads to referrals and further acquisition. This framework allows HubSpot to focus on long-term growth rather than one-off tactics.

A framework should be flexible enough to evolve as your product and market change, but it should also provide structure that keeps your growth efforts aligned with your company’s goals.

One effective growth framework is the AARRR (Pirate Metrics) framework, which stands for Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Referral, and Revenue. This simple model helps companies think through the entire user journey, from first interaction to long-term value, and ensure that every growth tactic they use is connected to one of these core metrics.

By focusing on frameworks instead of isolated tactics, you can avoid the trap of chasing shiny objects—new features, viral trends, or short-term growth hacks—that don’t align with your long-term goals. Instead, you’ll be able to build a consistent growth engine that can scale with your company over time.

👹

“But aren’t isolated tactics sometimes necessary to jumpstart growth?” Of course! Isolated tactics can be useful—especially early on when you need to gain traction or test new ideas quickly. The danger comes when companies rely too heavily on these tactics without tying them back to a larger strategy. If you’re constantly chasing growth through isolated tactics without thinking about the bigger picture, you risk creating a fragmented user experience or burning through resources without sustainable returns.

And That’s All for Today.